Back to ExamplesEvaluate Your Own Candidate

Example Evaluation

Teaching Demo Example: Clear pacing, a few modeling fixes

This sample page shows how an institute can review a teaching demo, watch the source clip, and see the exact strengths, issues, and verdict in one place.

Teaching demoOverall suitability score: 8.4Recommended

Why this example matters

This is the kind of candidate many teams would keep in process. The report helps show what is already strong enough for beginner learners and what would still need coaching before placement.

Linked video

Teaching demo video

Add a YouTube link when you are ready

This layout is already wired for a YouTube URL. Add the real link in the examples data file and the embed plus external button will appear automatically.

Browse Examples

Submission setup

Submitted videos

Teaching demo • Linked URL
Self-introduction • Linked URL

Preview uses: Self-introduction

Full report uses: Teaching demo

Likely English Variety

Philippine English

Confidence: medium

  • • Rhoticity stays consistent across sentence-final words.
  • • Short-vowel compression appears in a few model words.
  • • Stress placement remains stable during classroom instructions.

Full report

8.4/ 10

Overall suitability score

Recommended

Evaluator agreement: high

Reference ID: sample-demo-01 • Report email: sample-demo@teflscreen.com

Top strengths

  • • Instructions are sequenced clearly and repeated when needed.
  • • Teacher energy stays warm and beginner-friendly throughout the sample.
  • • Core classroom phrases remain easy to follow at normal speed.

Key issues

  • • A few target words lose final consonant clarity during modeling.
  • • Some grammar shortcuts would be risky to repeat for young beginners.
  • • Correction language could be slightly more explicit for weaker learners.

Detailed criteria breakdown

1. Comprehensibility & Pronunciation Clarity

8.2 / 10

Confidence: high

Issues

  • Final consonant weakening: "cat" lands closer to "ca" during repetition @ 00:42
  • Vowel contrast compression: "ship" and "sheep" are modeled too similarly @ 01:18

Strengths

  • • Most classroom instructions stay clear at natural speed.
  • • Important target words are repeated with strong sentence stress.

2. Language Accuracy & Teacher Modeling

7.9 / 10

Confidence: medium

Issues

  • Article omission: "Take marker" instead of "Take a marker" @ 00:57
  • Model inconsistency: "Say me" appears once during guided practice @ 01:34

Strengths

  • • Most sample sentences are age-appropriate and classroom-safe.
  • • Teacher consistently rephrases when a direction may be unclear.

3. Instructional Delivery & Scaffolding

8.6 / 10

Confidence: high

Issues

  • Instruction density: A three-step direction is delivered without a pause @ 02:05

Strengths

  • • Lesson flow is easy to follow from warm-up to guided practice.
  • • Transitions are signposted with clear cues for the learner.

4. Learner Engagement & Classroom Presence

8.8 / 10

Confidence: high

Issues

  • Pacing dip: Energy softens briefly during board-writing time @ 02:21

Strengths

  • • Tone remains encouraging without sounding forced.
  • • Camera presence feels classroom-ready and calm.